header image
 

Google SearchWiki is not a Wiki

Google has made a major change in its search interface. They called it Google SearchWiki. Its a big, brave, and bold step for Google, but already some people hate, some people loves it. Most of the users say, it is not a Wiki. As Ward Cunningham, the man who invented wikis, told us in our initial coverage of SearchWiki, “Collectively editing thoughts is what leads to the unique wiki behavior…” Days into the experiment it’s clear that this feature is more like a forum, and it’s not a particularly well architected one at that.

People start wondering why Google would choose to call this feature a wiki, when basically the evidence is not enough to prove that it is. You can’t edit anyone’s text in SearchWiki. You can’t collaborate intentionally – perhaps in effect users are collaborating by voting search results up and down, but that’s hardly the kind of collaborative behavior that every other wiki in the world makes possible.

There’s no way to reach consensus, or stasis, in SearchWiki. You can’t see the past history of anyone who contributes. Documents don’t change, they just get bigger. There’s no discussion of the “wiki” document, just the document itself.

The Two Biggest Problems With SearchWiki

There are two major problems with SearchWiki, beyond the fact that it’s not a wiki. First, the usability is awful. It’s really bad. Users have the visual UI of Google, famous for being clean and clear of disruptions, but if they want to view the markup from other users they have to scroll all the way down to the bottom of the search results page. Then, in many cases, clicking that button just tells you there are no wiki results. 

 

 

Second, there’s no changing, challenging or hiding anything that’s been posted. Try a search for McDonald’s, for example. There are two notes – one from some random web designer that’s spamming the “wiki” with a link to his page, the other from some joker testing the obscenity filter. Neither can be removed, edited, nothing. We presume that the McDonald’s PR department has seen this – but is there anything that even they can do about it? Apparently not. Wait until it’s you that has things you don’t like appended to the page just one click away from page 1 Google for your name – what are you going to do about it?

This Could Be Big

Wikipedia has a big, engaged community that’s worked out some practices and tools to make it all work as well as it does. Google, on the other hand, threw hundreds of millions of people into a forum, called it a wiki and left everyone to their own devices.

 

 

 

Category:  Uncategorized     

WikiGenes-Evolutionary Knowledge

WikiGenes is the site constructed by Mememoir which aims into one particular point concerning anonymity. WikiGenes is a official scientific wiki site where there would be no such thing as anonymity. Every person who does a contribution gets referenced and is able to be rated by other users in the wiki. WikiGenes is officially released by Mememoir project recently and WikiGenes can be explained in a better way by watching this video as the site does not have much information about it’s function.

This would be a breakthrough because Wikipedia itself has not developed such program or project. In Wikipedia, unregistered users cannot be referenced when they edit articles and give rating therefore issues could arise and also the quality of articles would not be good. Having articles properly referenced and properly rated by other registered users, can guarantee the quality and the use of articles provided in the wiki.

Source: www.wikigenes.org

Category:  Uncategorized     

Psychologist invents new uber-wiki

Recently, an American psychologist invented a new “uber-wiki” in which  every word of the wiki has a direct link to the author who created the wiki. This project is known to “revolutionize publishing in all of science”. We are aware that currently wiki’s have been facing issues in finding who wrote what in the article. The project is called Mememoir and also tends to make Wikipedia obsolete.

They also reckon that the standard methods of wiki administration have an important problem as first generation wikis depend on slow and refutable top-down decisions.

“But Hoffman reckons he has the answer in his new Mememoir superwiki, where every word is attributable – leading, apparently, to the “End of Anonymity”. Similarly, the mysterious dealings of Wikipedia admins, ArbComs etc. are to be replaced by “a self-reguulating repuation system” based on -wait for it- users rating each others contributions.”

The new wiki+digg+2.0 sciento-mashup-u-like kit is described at mememoir.org, or you can watch a vid, play with it etc here.

Source: Article

Category:  Uncategorized     

UberSpat.com a Digg and Wiki Mashup

UberSpat is a debating site which allows it’s users to submit any sort of articles and blog posts which is almost identical as Digg. However, the article submitted can then be supported or in opposition to a debate. it is then rated by users and the best of the evidence of the article floats up to the top and gets better ranked.

This then allows users for research topics which is what pretty much we do on a wiki. The similarity to Digg is that users are able to add new articles and have them being dug up or down but however the user’s rate submissions relates to how the evidence to the debate in hand. Digg is a website where anyone can submit and share any content from around the world. Users can vote and comment on the content submitted in a social and democratic spirit.

“UberSpat is an online debating community that allows users to submit any debate of their choosing. Although online debating communities are not necessarily a novel idea, the way UberSpat implements the idea is quite unique. In UberSpat, users can submit articles that support or oppose a particular side of a debate. That evidence can then be rated by others, allowing the best evidence to float to the top. In this way, UberSpat also becomes an excellent resource tool much like Wiki.”

People who have a certain interest in a particular topic, eg; Automotive, can create their own debate and watch all the evidences of the topic rolling in. They can read the evidences from both the sides of the debate and eventually make up their mind.

Bloggers that like to debate can create debates on UberSpat that is centered around their blogs. They can then submit those blog articles as evidence to their debate. This provides them with a link back to their own blogs and hopefully a better ranking on search engines such as Google.

Source

Category:  Uncategorized     

Wetpaint

Wetpaint is a site where we can build a free wiki website in just 3 easy steps. You simply choose a topic and decide wether it’s open for public or private. After that step, you decide teh contents on your wiki and edit the way you desire it to be. Photo’s video’s and any other sorts of media is accesible. As seen from the features, it tells us a lot of why Wetpaint differs from any other Wiki as it allows users to collaborate more in an extensive way with other websites and working together with search engines. They work together for having site notifications on recent news and events that may relate to the wii itself. The Wiki being offered in Wetpaint does not seem like any other regular Wiki as it is more advanced in it’s application and features. I will be trying out on creating a Wiki page during the holidays and have updates on the blog on how it progresses.

Features from Wetpaint:

Building Your Site

  • Click-and-Type Page Editing
  • Easy Photo/Video Integration
  • Photo Galleries
  • Page Level Discussion Threads
  • Customizable Page Templates
  • Spell Check
  • Tables
  • Cross-browser Consistency
  • Compare Page Versions
  • Attachments
  • Menu of Popular Widgets

Growing Your Site

  • “Invite Others” Feature
  • Private Onsite Messaging
  • Address Book Upload
  • Autocomplete Link Destinations
  • Automatic Link Suggestions

Navigating Your Site

  • Dynamic Page Organization
  • Clickable Keyword Tags
  • Clickable “Top Contributor” Photos
  • Site Search

Monitoring Your Site

  • Lockable Pages
  • Move/Delete Pages
  • Rename/Restore Pages
  • Move/Delete Comments
  • Revert Pages
  • Site Statistics:
  • - Google Analytics
  • - SiteMeter
  • Watchlists

Site Notifications

  • RSS updates:
    • - New Pages
    • - Recently Updated Pages
    • - Recent Comments

 

  • Email Notifications:
    • - Activity Alerts
    • - News & Feature Updates
    • - Community Messaging

 Source: www.wetpaint.com

Category:  Uncategorized     

Wikis are now a serious business

Wiki’s have become serious in most business industries. A website called “Wetpaint” the popular website that allows users to make free wikis, will be integrating functionality that lets you embed your wiki into pre-existing websites.

These are the 10 causes that makes wikis very useful in the business industries:

 

“Very Simple Publishing”

If you’ve got something that you want to throw up on a web page, to see how it renders or to share it with others, a wiki is one of the easiest and fastest ways to do so. Some people use wikis as personal notepads with version history, as well. If it doesn’t have to look fancy and you might want to change it quickly later, try putting it on a wiki.

Check out Liz B. Davis’s wiki called Integrating 21st Century Tools into Your Teaching, where you can find slideshow and video tutorials about how to start using tools like Del.icio.us, GMail, Ning, Google Docs and more. It’s a great example of using a wiki to quickly and easily share some personal knowledge through a very simple publishing platform.

“Building Text for Common Communication”

Everyone knows that wikis are good for collaborative writing, but what kinds of things might you write collaboratively? Creative asset management company Extensis uses an internal wiki to craft agreed upon replies to common email inquiries. That sounds like a great time saver and a good way to make sure that day-in-day-out email communication stays helpful, professional and up to date even if it’s a snoozer for the people who happen to be sending the replies.

A solution like the SproutIt Mailroom might be more sophisticated, but sometimes you just want something quick and dirty.

“Structured Information”

Wikis are generally presumed to present nothing but an empty box and a WYSIWYG editor, but that’s not always the case. The online community for book readers Shelfari, for example, recently added a section for author wikis. These author wikis are a combination of free text space and a structured, biographical section.

The software used is called DekiWiki, from Mindtouch. Shelfari doesn’t use the DekiWiki interface, though, it just ties its pages into DekiWiki services. While Wetpaint Inject is getting some press this week, DekiWiki’s API offers more seamless, more powerful integration into partner websites.

“Notes for After a Performance”

A number of popular podcasts have experimented with setting up a wiki for listeners to fill out show notes about each episode of their shows – but that hasn’t worked out very well. If you really want a wiki about a performance to be populated, you’re going to have to do it yourself.

No one has done a better job of consistently putting up notes from conference talks than Beth Kanter, one of the most respected nonprofit tech consultants on the web. Kanter posts all of her notes here and makes sure everyone in the audiences of the many good talks she gives knows that URL. A particularly good example can be found in the page she set up for a recent talk about using social media for people in the arts. That one includes several examples of live video broadcast from the presentation using Qik.

Beth has blogged extensively about best practices in using wikis, as well.

“Event Organizing”

The widely viewed CommonCraft video called Wikis in Plain English uses event organizing, in this case planning a picnic, as its tutorial example. Sure enough, there are any number of organizations around the world using wikis to organize events.

The Toronto Transit Camp is one example of an attractive event wiki. All of Barcamp, an event organized like a wiki and now spread throughout the world, is organized using wikis.

Even the campaign of President-to-be Barack Obama is using a wiki to organize volunteers for his campaign. See also Clinton Attacks Obama, a unofficial wiki created by Baratunde Thurston to track and analyze the race-based attacks against Obama made by the Clinton campaign.

“Disaster Relief”

When talking about Presidential politics these days, it’s hard not to talk about disasters both literal and figurative. Wikis come in handy there too. KatrinaHelp.info got better press for being helpful than FEMA did during Katrina.

Now a new group of people is starting to work on a new wiki to gather resources to send to China to aid victims of the Sichuan Earthquake . That project is just in its formative stages but it could use your support. If you haven’t been following the quake in China much, there’s an interesting perspective on the event in a series of photos taken by a wedding photographer before and after the quake hit.

“News Writing”

Can wikis be used to write the news? Only in some cases, but when those succeed they are a real inspiration. The LA Times’ infamous experiment turning a 2005 editorial about the Iraq War into a wiki was absurd, but the far more well-informed Wikipedia project called WikiNews appears to be near death as well. If you want to find a good example of a thriving news wiki community, check out the sports site ArmChairGM, one of a number of active sites over at Wikia. The point is, news can be written by wiki – but it’s easier said than done.

“Discussing Public Policy”

For all the hot air offered by democratically elected governments about incorporating citizen input into decision making, wikis are emerging as an interesting way to try to make the process of gathering such input real.

The city of Melbourne, Australia launched an official wiki today to discuss the future of the city. I’d love to see the Mayor of my city on the front page of a wiki asking for contributions!

Likewise, the Dharavi Redevelopment Project is using a wiki to gather resources for use in planning redevelopment of one of India’s largest areas of hyper-poverty. Wikis don’t have to be a privilege touching only the world’s wealthiest people.

“Exposing Research Publicly”

While wikis are usually thought of as available for public collaboration, they can also be useful in showcasing content developed by a closed group. The Democratic National Committee today unveiled its McCainPedia, a collection of information it’s gathering about presumptive Republican Presidential nominee John McCain. Early feedback has included some criticism that the wiki isn’t publicly editable, but on the other hand isn’t it better to do this closed research in the light of day than not?

Stockholm University’s Department of Biophysics and Biochemistry launched a new website this week with the same strategy. The wiki isn’t publicly editable, but its members get to use a wiki interface to add content and anyone can view it.

“Revive Archived Content”

Finally, possibly the most interesting serious use of a wiki that we’ve seen of late is today’s announcement that legacy web developer community WebMonkey has been acquired by Wired.com and is turning all of its archived content into wiki pages. That’s a great way to enable a community of users to breathe new life into archived content that is less timely than news stories but could still use some updating.

“This is Serious Stuff”

Wikis are no longer just for fringe articles on obscure topics and they don’t have to just be for pop-culture fluff that over-invested companies can run Adsense next to. Wikis are ready for serious work use, if you’re ready for them. That’s easier said than done, though. Now that we’ve shared with you a list of examples illustrating the possibilities, we’ll leave you with consultant Stewart Mader’s excellent recent video tutorial series 21 Days of Wiki Adoption.

We hope you’ve found this informative and inspiring – we’d love to learn about some of your favorite examples of serious uses of wikis. Check out Mader’s tips below and then let’s go out and wiki!

 

http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wiki_business.php

Category:  Uncategorized     

Agencies are adopting Wikis to share knowledge

By Richard W. Walker
Published on April 29, 2008

Wikis are proliferating in the federal government as officials seek effective ways to share information and collaborate.

For example, the State Department’s Diplopedia has 700 registered editors and contains about 3,700 articles, said Eric Johnson, leader of the Knowledge Management Action Team in the department’s Office of eDiplomacy.

Officials also ensure that each article includes a disclaimer stating that it is “informative and deliberative but not authoritative,” he said. “We encourage [editors] to link to authoritative content within the article,” such as State’s Foreign Affairs Manual or an appropriate U.S. statute.

Currently, they are trying to shape the way the information is organized and being presented. With about 3,700 articles, categorization must be into their attention. To handle this, each article belongs to one or more categories.

Sorce:http://www.fcw.com/online/news/152383-1.html

Category:  Uncategorized     

WikiAnswers

WikiAnswers is a question and answer database where we can enter any question in the wiki and the database will then provide us with the best answer matching our question.

“WikiAnswersTM is a wiki-based website that is growing constantly as people from all walks of life share their knowledge. It is the user-driven component of Answers.com where visitors contribute what they know and ask about what they don’t.”

This wiki is very interesting because it has a very broad range of topics and we are able ask any questions regarding those topics. People ask each others question and answer them while in the mean time, we improve answers that are not satisfying enough.

The way wiki answer works is that we simply fill in the question box with any sort of question and not all of the questions have answers. If the question we asked is not yet answered, we then research about it to provide an answer. Other users or basically anyone is able to edit it and justify the answer better when needed. Wiki answers is basically a large database containing questions and answers provided and served for anyone.

http://wiki.answers.com/

Category:  Uncategorized     

Fedora Project Wiki

This wiki is aimed at end users and developers to collaborate with one another. Fedora is said to be a Linux-Based operating system. So i guess what this wiki does is that, it’s developers of Fedora share the wiki together in creating it’s software and doing updates because the product comes out twice a year. It is said to be a free software and does not take any cost.

More information:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/

Category:  Uncategorized     

TWiki: the Open Source Wiki for the Enterprise.

TWiki is a enterprise collaboration platform and a knowledge managment system. It is more of a structured wiki, project development space, document managment system, knowledge base, and any other groupware tool either on the internet or the intranet. Unskilled users without programming skills are able to create web applications. Developers can extend the functionality of TWiki with Plugins TWiki fosters information flow within an organization. It lets distributed teams work together seamlessly and productively.

More on TWiki:

http://www.twiki.org/

Category:  Uncategorized